Search results for "party autonomy."

showing 3 items of 3 documents

Reflections about the authentic document in "post mortem" fecundation

2018

[EN] The legislation on assisted reproduction contemplates the ¿post mortem¿ fecundation. Nevertheless, the document for the presentation of the assent raises some doubts in relation with the principle of party autonomy and the new technologies of the information and communication (ICTs). In the present work one thinks about these questions and one tries to contribute some solution of application in the Spanish legal system.

:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]Documento indubitadoFecundación post mortemfecundación ?post mortem?Authentic documentthe document for the presentation of the assent raises some doubts in relation with the principle of party autonomy and the new technologies of the information and communication (ICTs). In the present work one thinks about these questions and one tries to contribute some solution of application in the Spanish legal system. Documento indubitadoDERECHO CIVILLegislaciónUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 502169 2018 9 6653336 Reflexiones acerca del documento indubitado en la fecundación ?post mortem? Ramón Fernándezlegislación.post mortem fecundationFrancisca The legislation on assisted reproduction contemplates the ?post mortem? fecundation. Nevertheless
researchProduct

Agreement on the Choice of Non-applicable Law or Law not in Accordance with Article 22(1) of the Twin Regulations: what Consequences for the Couple’s…

2021

Los Reglamentos (UE) 2016/1103 y 2016/1104 del Consejo autorizan a las parejas transfronterizas a elegir la ley aplicable a sus relaciones patrimoniales sobre la base de uno de los criterios enumerados en el artículo 22.1. Sin embargo, el acuerdo de elección de la ley puede tener un contenido diferente al señalado en la redacción del artículo 22 de los ?Reglamentos Gemelos?. El objetivo del análisis es ilustrar que sería incorrecto sostener que tales acuerdos son, a priori, inválidos o no permiten la autonomía de la voluntad. Esta cuestión requiere una evaluación de la finalidad concreta del acuerdo de las partes y debería, al menos, estar abierta al examen del tribunal competente.

Francesco Los Reglamentos (UE) 2016/1103 y 2016/1104 del Consejo autorizan a las parejas transfronterizas a elegir la ley aplicable a sus relaciones patrimoniales sobre la base de uno de los criterios enumerados en el artículo 22.1. Sin embargoelección positiva/negativapositive/negative choicewhat consequences for the couple?s property regime? Giacomo Viterbo [2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113563 Agreement on the choice of non-applicable law or law not in accordance with article 22(1) of the twin regulations]2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113563 Agreement on the choice of non-applicable law or law not in accordance with article 22(1) of the twin regulations: what consequences for the couple?s property regime? Giacomo Viterboestar abierta al examen del tribunal competente. Party autonomyasesoramiento jurídicochoice-of-law agreementacuerdo de elección de leyinterpretation.interpretation:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]al menoselección informadavalidez formal y materiala prioriimplicit/indirect choiceel acuerdo de elección de la ley puede tener un contenido diferente al señalado en la redacción del artículo 22 de los ?Reglamentos Gemelos?. El objetivo del análisis es ilustrar que sería incorrecto sostener que tales acuerdos sonley aplicableinterpretación. 292 307Party autonomyAutonomía de las parteselección implícita/indirectaUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASformal and material validityinválidos o no permiten la autonomía de la voluntad. Esta cuestión requiere una evaluación de la finalidad concreta del acuerdo de las partes y deberíalegal adviceapplicable lawinformed choice
researchProduct

Party autonomy regarding jurisdiction under the property regimes regulations

2021

The main accomplishment of the Property Regimes Regulations lies in their bringing more coherence into the cross-border family law adjudication. In the field of international jurisdiction, they strive to align the competence in couples? patrimony disputes to that in succession and in separation proceedings, or else to align the competence of the courts to the applicable law. These tendencies are clearly visible in the Regulations? provisions on choice of court agreements. Namely, the Regulations allow for such agreements, but severely limit parties? choice and the possible effects of these clauses. When succession or separation proceedings are pending, it is often only possible to institute…

party autonomy.registered couples? propertyit is often only possible to institute patrimonial disputes at the same court as the said proceedings. When proceedings concerning matrimonial or registered partners? property are initiated without previously pending succession or divorce proceedingshoweveror else to align the competence of the courts to the applicable law. These tendencies are clearly visible in the Regulations? provisions on choice of court agreements. Namelyanalogy with other EU regulations and the CJEU case-law can be of help. The critical eye of the doctrine isrégimen económico-matrimonialRegulation 1104/2016mainly cast on the unpredictable fate of the choice of court agreements under the Regulations. The paper analyses the complex regulation of the choice-ofcourt agreements in the Property Regimes Regulationsautonomía de parte. 274 291draws attention to open questions and provides possible answers. Choice-of-court agreementjurisdictionmatrimonial propertybut severely limit parties? choice and the possible effects of these clauses. When succession or separation proceedings are pendingthey strive to align the competence in couples? patrimony disputes to that in succession and in separation proceedings:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]parties can avail themselves of a fairly limited list of options to choose a court from. The Regulations leave several questions regarding choice of court agreements unanswered. Oftenjurisdicciónthe Regulations allow for such agreementsAcuerdo de elección del fororégimen de parejas registradasor else when the necessary consent to the joinder is not given2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113562 Party autonomy regarding jurisdiction under the property regimes regulations Kramberger ?kerlJerca The main accomplishment of the Property Regimes Regulations lies in their bringing more coherence into the cross-border family law adjudication. In the field of international jurisdictionReglamento 1103/2016UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASRegulation 1103/2016Reglamento 1104/2016
researchProduct